Joe Hartshorn
Dr. Dan Williams
5 September 2017
Lewis’ accounts were intensely descriptive. These
journals of his were much more tailored towards relaying information about the
landscape, nature, and wildlife surrounding him during his journey rather than
his raw emotion towards what he was experiencing. While this heavily
descriptive tone wasn’t the most exciting material to read, it did leave me pondering
why no one really writes, or better yet thinks, in such descriptive and detailed
tones. Prior to taking this class, I can’t remember the last time I was idle
with a focused mind intent on examining every detail of something I encountered
in my life, both in the material world and in my experiences in nature. Rather,
it seems that for the most part that my generation lacks both the desire and
more so the ability to gather such intense detail from our daily experiences.
Everything I typically do these days is in a fast paced manner, attempting to
gather as much information as possible about the area around me in as little
time required. The first thought is that the advancements in technology in
recent years could be a major reason for this, as millennial attention spans
have been zapped by scrolling through social media, using Google to gather
information quickly rather than doing detailed research in texts, and
multimedia making information easier to relay. After reading Lewis’ accounts
and coming to this realization, I spent some of our time in the Botanic Gardens
attempting to focus on the environment around me in a similarly detailed manner.
Throughout our discussions, I chose to spend some time
examining the grass that we were all sitting on, as the grass was easiest to
examine closely from where we were sitting and the fact that I am always
walking through grass yet have never really examined the plant. The more time I
spent contemplating the grass the more interested I seemed to become. It’s
fascinating that what we refer to as “grass” all the time consists of literally
individual blades. Every single blade makes up what we refer to as “grass”, yet
we consider all of the blades as a group to be what we call the “grass”, if
that makes sense. I kept getting hung up on that idea. Why are we generalizing
all of these individual blades of grass and grouping them into one? Is that
even considered a generalization? Are we undermining the beauty of grass in
that this infinite number of blades flows together to create one of our most
utilized surfaces for standing upon? I started to begin to feel like grass
itself is one of the most ‘taken for granted’ aspects of the natural world we
exist in. We continue to advance industrially and urbanize our world, yet grass
remains essential and valued by all. Everyone desires to have beautiful, green
grass surrounding their homes. Why is that? If we strive to continue to advance
industrially, why are we keeping grass around?
No comments:
Post a Comment